Google Says Quality is Dirt Cheap, Don’t Hire Copywriters

by Christina Gleason on June 10, 2009

According to Matt Cutts of Google, Internet marketers should avoid the unethical practice of buying links by paying a few pennies to the folks who complete tasks via Amazon Mechanical Turk and scoring free links from their efforts. Let me rephrase that: Google says it’s wrong to pay for other people to link to your Web site, but it’s totally cool to score hundreds or thousands of links – not by paying a professional copywriter to create an awesome resource for you – but by spending about 20 bucks for a handful of people to perform cheap labor for you with Amazon Mechanical Turk. Don’t believe me? Watch this video.

In case you’re unfamiliar with Amazon Mechanical Turk, it’s a place where companies pay unwitting individuals a few cents to complete tasks that can’t be automated. Looking to work from home? As I write this blog post, you can earn a whole penny for taking 10 minutes to answer some questions about a news article. If you do six of these tasks in an hour, you’re making an hourly wage of 6 whole cents! I tried doing these tasks when I was unemployed last year, and even with my efficiency, I wasn’t even making minimum wage.

crap

But according to Google, this is a perfectly acceptable way to outsource crowdsource your linkbait. Matt Cutts talks about someone who paid a total of $25 to get a whole bunch of people to compile a list of adjectives about top Twitter users. This is quality content. And not just any quality content, it’s pure linkbait gold. This is what  Google wants to index. It’s completely within their guidelines for ethical SEO.

As a damn good copywriter, I take offense to this. This isn’t quality content. This is crap. This is pandering to the lowest common denominator for a quick chuckle, and paying slave wages to make it happen. Where is the quality in that? Tell me, Matt Cutts of Google’s Webspam team, why would you promote the proliferation of crap like this online instead of encouraging people to invest in something of value?

Dude, I was a Quality Rater. I know what your quality guidelines are – or at least what they were a year and a half ago. Have you really fallen so far? Do you really want to tell the world that what the Internet needs is another insipid fluff piece about Twitter? I’m sorry, sir, but you’ve just discredited everything you’ve ever said about quality content online.

And what is “white hat” about paying crap wages for something inane that could potentially make your business thousands of dollars? That may not break anything in your Webmaster guidelines, but it certainly doesn’t seem ethical to me. Just because you can get away with paying someone a nickel for 45 minutes of work doesn’t mean that you should. In fact, it would be against U.S. employment laws if there was an employee relationship involved. But that’s a whole different rant about the abuse of independent contractors.

All content is paid for in one form or another. I happen to make a living writing quality content because, during my stint as a Quality Rater, I actually wanted to try and make the Internet a better place. What’s the difference in paying writers (say, bloggers perhaps?) to review and link to your product than paying someone to produce content for you in order to attract links? On one hand, the money goes to the writer to manipulate people into linking, on the other hand, the money goes to the writer who was “manipulated” into publishing the link.

Oh wait, that’s right… bloggers should work for free and shouldn’t be paid for linking to companies in the first place. That’s essentially what it’s come down to when Google instituted this “no paid links” policy. The companies don’t suffer. They’re getting free freaking publicity by not paying bloggers to link to them. Yeah, I’m a blogger, too. It’s ridiculous how many moms I know are working for free so that they can have the “honor” of reviewing a $5 product and not get slammed for writing a paid review. It’s crap.

But Google doesn’t respect content creators. That much is clear. It just wasn’t obvious to me just how badly the search giant wanted to screw content producers until now. Google doesn’t really care about quality content. They just want everyone to jump through their hoops so they can keep making money hand over fist for other people’s hard work.

{ 13 trackbacks }

6 Tips for Behavior and Managing Social Media Community Profiles | USASEOPros Blog
June 11, 2009 at 2:04 pm
Your Content Should Educate, Engage, Entertain and Entice | Black Hat for a Noob
June 14, 2009 at 2:05 am
Your Content Should Educate, Engage, Entertain and Entice
June 14, 2009 at 12:23 pm
Your Content Should Educate, Engage, Entertain and Entice | rapid-DEV.net
June 15, 2009 at 1:17 am
The Exploitation of Independent Contractors — Christina Gleason - Founder of Phenomenal Content LLC
June 15, 2009 at 9:13 am
» Sweatshop blogging. Good for marketers, bad for writers. - ibrandcasting.com
June 18, 2009 at 7:27 am
» Sweatshop blogging. Good for marketers, bad for writers. - brandsplat
June 18, 2009 at 7:35 am
Google Wants Artists to Work for FREE — Christina Gleason - Founder of Phenomenal Content LLC
June 22, 2009 at 10:30 am
aggregator » Blog Archive » Per Google la qualità dei contenuti non ha valore
July 6, 2009 at 6:16 am
Your Content Should Educate, Engage, Entertain and Entice | Did You Know?
July 6, 2009 at 4:13 pm
6 Tips for Behavior and Managing Social Media Community Profiles | RJ67
September 25, 2009 at 11:40 am
Why I Should Be in the We Blog Conference Focus Group — Cutest Kid Ever - A Mommy Blog
January 5, 2010 at 6:53 pm
Why I’m Not Cheap and Why That’s a Good Thing | Angie's Copywriting Services
June 21, 2010 at 8:21 am

{ 52 comments… read them below or add one }

SteveG June 10, 2010 at 5:52 pm

I think Christina hit it exactly on the head.. Hypothetically, someone could semi automate auto blogs using Turk, pay $1 per post, or less, generate 100 blogs, 10 posts per blog for 10 weeks of “fresh content” and still only be out $100.. And who does that benefit?? Readers?? Nope, no readers on those blogs?? Writers?? Nope, no real writer would ever write like that for that little money.. Google?? Maybe, if that person was running 6 ad blocks from adsense and churning through the top paying terms for that blog run..

Couple that with a few other “tools” and you have a way to make a fair amount of money while contributing absolutely nothing of value to the internet community..

Nope, nothing evil here at all.. Good thing I don’t know anyone that does that..

pawn shops online houston September 6, 2014 at 10:32 pm

This article will help the internet visitors for creating new webpage or even a weblog from
start to end.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: